The Difference Between Pipe Jacking and Microtunneling

By Trenchlesspedia Staff
Published: September 27, 2023 | Last updated: September 27, 2023
Key Takeaways

Pipe jacking and microtunneling are both trenchless techniques for installing pipes, they differ in several ways. Factors such as pipe diameter, installation length, project budget, access requirements, and surface disruption should be considered when deciding which technique to use.

Trenchless technology has revolutionized the construction industry in the past few decades. With the advent of trenchless techniques like pipe jacking and microtunneling, construction projects can now be completed in a fraction of the time and cost it took using traditional methods. However, not all trenchless techniques are the same, and it is important to understand the differences between them to make an informed decision about which technique to use for a particular project.

What is Pipe Jacking?

Pipe jacking is a trenchless technique that involves the installation of pipes by pushing them through the ground. The process begins with the excavation of a launch shaft and a reception shaft. The pipes are then pushed through the ground from the launch shaft to the reception shaft using a hydraulic ram. The ram applies pressure to the pipes, pushing them through the ground as the excavated soil is removed from the launch shaft.

Pipe jacking is ideal for installing pipes in a straight line, but it can also be used to install pipes with a slight curvature. The technique is most commonly used for the installation of pipes for sewer and drainage systems, but it can also be used for the installation of utility pipelines and other infrastructure.

What is Microtunneling?

Microtunneling is a trenchless technique that involves the installation of pipes using a microtunneling machine. The process begins with the excavation of a launch shaft and a reception shaft, similar to pipe jacking. However, instead of pushing the pipes through the ground, a microtunneling machine is used to bore a tunnel through the ground. The machine excavates the soil, which is then transported to the surface using a slurry.

Once the tunnel is complete, the pipes are inserted into the tunnel and pushed through to the reception shaft. The tunnel is then back filled with grout, completing the installation process.

Microtunneling is ideal for installing pipes in a straight line, as well as pipes with a curve or a change in direction. The technique is commonly used for the installation of utility pipelines, as well as sewer and drainage systems.

What are the Differences Between Pipe Jacking and Microtunneling?

Although pipe jacking and microtunneling are both trenchless techniques for installing pipes, they differ in several ways. Here are some of the key differences:

  • Method of Installation:

    Pipe jacking involves pushing the pipes through the ground, while microtunneling involves boring a tunnel through the ground and then inserting the pipes.

  • Diameter of Pipes:

    Pipe jacking is typically used for the installation of smaller diameter pipes, while microtunneling can be used for larger diameter pipes.

  • Length of Installation:

    Pipe jacking is typically used for shorter installations, while microtunneling is ideal for longer installations.

  • Cost:

    Pipe jacking is generally less expensive than microtunneling, but this can vary depending on the specific project requirements.

  • Access Requirements:

    Pipe jacking requires a larger launch shaft and reception shaft than microtunneling, making it less ideal for projects with limited space.

  • Surface Disruption:

    Pipe jacking can cause surface disruption, as the ground needs to be excavated to create the launch and reception shafts. Microtunneling, on the other hand, causes minimal surface disruption, as the tunneling machine is underground.

Choosing the Best Method

Understanding the differences between these techniques is crucial in choosing the most appropriate method for a particular project. Factors such as pipe diameter, installation length, project budget, access requirements, and surface disruption should be considered when deciding which technique to use. By selecting the appropriate trenchless technique, construction projects can be completed more efficiently, with less disruption, and at a lower cost.

Share This Article

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Related Articles

Go back to top